Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Draft Talk
Prospects you are A LOT higher on than consensus…
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dantés" data-source="post: 1032609" data-attributes="member: 12283"><p>Well let me just say first, I have neither the resources nor the expertise to be dogmatic about something like this. I'm not carefully studying All 22 and drawing a conclusion that's 100% my own. I've watched Cooper a bit and I like him, but this is about more than that as well. </p><p></p><p>-He's had three very productive seasons in the SEC. He was playing starting level snaps as a 19 year old. </p><p></p><p>-He's got good size for this era of football and a big enough frame to carry more weight. He's really long (95th% arm length, 88th% wingspan) without being too tall or high cut (6'2"). </p><p></p><p>-He's not an elite athlete, but he's a very good one (9.13 RAS). Probably the most explosive linebacker in this class on tape, backed up by a 4.51 forty and a 1.56 ten split. His other measurables (jumps and agilities) are all solid. </p><p></p><p>-He has a diversified skill-set. He's a good blitzer, he has some zone coverage ability, he has the movement to match TE's or RB's in man coverage, and he's got serious range against the run and the screen game. </p><p></p><p>-While he isn't proficient at stacking and shedding blocks, virtually no one coming out of college football is. He has the length and explosive power to become more than adequate. </p><p></p><p>-While his consensus is #40, there are some noted names that really like him. Jeremiah has him at #29 and actually started with him at #20 back in January. Legwold just released his annual top 100 and had him at #26. Cosell doesn't rank people but believes him to be the top linebacker by a wide margin. </p><p></p><p>So I think he's a pretty darn good prospect and made all the more valuable by how poor this class is overall. Ideally, they would trade down and then take him, but if they were stuck at #25 and the board was cleaned out of tackles, I think he should be in play.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dantés, post: 1032609, member: 12283"] Well let me just say first, I have neither the resources nor the expertise to be dogmatic about something like this. I'm not carefully studying All 22 and drawing a conclusion that's 100% my own. I've watched Cooper a bit and I like him, but this is about more than that as well. -He's had three very productive seasons in the SEC. He was playing starting level snaps as a 19 year old. -He's got good size for this era of football and a big enough frame to carry more weight. He's really long (95th% arm length, 88th% wingspan) without being too tall or high cut (6'2"). -He's not an elite athlete, but he's a very good one (9.13 RAS). Probably the most explosive linebacker in this class on tape, backed up by a 4.51 forty and a 1.56 ten split. His other measurables (jumps and agilities) are all solid. -He has a diversified skill-set. He's a good blitzer, he has some zone coverage ability, he has the movement to match TE's or RB's in man coverage, and he's got serious range against the run and the screen game. -While he isn't proficient at stacking and shedding blocks, virtually no one coming out of college football is. He has the length and explosive power to become more than adequate. -While his consensus is #40, there are some noted names that really like him. Jeremiah has him at #29 and actually started with him at #20 back in January. Legwold just released his annual top 100 and had him at #26. Cosell doesn't rank people but believes him to be the top linebacker by a wide margin. So I think he's a pretty darn good prospect and made all the more valuable by how poor this class is overall. Ideally, they would trade down and then take him, but if they were stuck at #25 and the board was cleaned out of tackles, I think he should be in play. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
thequick12
Latest posts
The Jordan Love Era Begins
Latest: thequick12
4 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
P
Packers Official Schedule For 2024
Latest: PackerDNA
Today at 8:58 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Breaking Down the NFC North, 2024
Latest: SudsMcBucky
Today at 3:11 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Lions Give Jared Goff a 4 year, 212M Extension
Latest: El Guapo
Today at 9:41 AM
NFL Discussions
Free Agency Thread
Latest: Poppa San
Today at 8:51 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Draft Talk
Prospects you are A LOT higher on than consensus…
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top