Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Draft Talk
2013 Draft Archive
Is Ted interested in this guy?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="HardRightEdge" data-source="post: 495591"><p>Here's a decent overview:</p><p> </p><p><a href="http://www.nfl.com/draft/2013/profiles/david-quessenberry?id=2539301" target="_blank">http://www.nfl.com/draft/2013/profiles/david-quessenberry?id=2539301</a></p><p> </p><p>Quessenberry got some high marks at the Senior Bowl. His very good 20 yard shuttle at the Combine indicates quick feet and agility. His arm length and hand size would not be considered optimal at LT, but they're in line with Fisher's....NFL-acceptable if everything else is working. He might need to bulk a bit, but he fits the Packer profile of pass block first, run block second. A guy like this could steal the LT spot if he hits the top end of expectations; more likely a backup in year 1.</p><p> </p><p>MM likes to carry just 7 OL on the 53 man roster, so this guy's versatility would be attractive.</p><p> </p><p>I think there's a general consensus we'll be looking to add an O-Lineman in the first 3 rounds; this guy carries a 3rd. round grade in some quarters. The question becomes who will be the odd man out in a 7 OL roster configuration?</p><p> </p><p>Lang, EDS, Sitton are probably set. MM has mentioned looking at Bulaga at LT; in any event he'll man one side or the other. The fact they're even talking about Bulaga going to the left side indicates a high regard for Barclay. We know Barclay can run block, probably has some upside, and can back up at G. If we add a guy like Quessenberry, or go higher for an OT starter, there is a good chance Newhouse or Sherrod will not make it to opening day.</p><p> </p><p>The problem with going higher for a starting tackle is that the 7 man configuration would be without a backup center, a position where Quessenberry shows some promise.</p><p> </p><p>MM could always go with an 8 man OL configuration. He's a pretty stubborn guy so I would not count on it, and you can't stash a pick from the first 3 rounds on the PS without somebody signing him away.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="HardRightEdge, post: 495591"] Here's a decent overview: [url]http://www.nfl.com/draft/2013/profiles/david-quessenberry?id=2539301[/url] Quessenberry got some high marks at the Senior Bowl. His very good 20 yard shuttle at the Combine indicates quick feet and agility. His arm length and hand size would not be considered optimal at LT, but they're in line with Fisher's....NFL-acceptable if everything else is working. He might need to bulk a bit, but he fits the Packer profile of pass block first, run block second. A guy like this could steal the LT spot if he hits the top end of expectations; more likely a backup in year 1. MM likes to carry just 7 OL on the 53 man roster, so this guy's versatility would be attractive. I think there's a general consensus we'll be looking to add an O-Lineman in the first 3 rounds; this guy carries a 3rd. round grade in some quarters. The question becomes who will be the odd man out in a 7 OL roster configuration? Lang, EDS, Sitton are probably set. MM has mentioned looking at Bulaga at LT; in any event he'll man one side or the other. The fact they're even talking about Bulaga going to the left side indicates a high regard for Barclay. We know Barclay can run block, probably has some upside, and can back up at G. If we add a guy like Quessenberry, or go higher for an OT starter, there is a good chance Newhouse or Sherrod will not make it to opening day. The problem with going higher for a starting tackle is that the 7 man configuration would be without a backup center, a position where Quessenberry shows some promise. MM could always go with an 8 man OL configuration. He's a pretty stubborn guy so I would not count on it, and you can't stash a pick from the first 3 rounds on the PS without somebody signing him away. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
weeds
Latest posts
OTAs
Latest: OldSchool101
Today at 3:02 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Shareholders meeting 2024?
Latest: weeds
Today at 1:19 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
H
Update on Watson's Hamstrngs
Latest: Heyjoe4
Today at 6:14 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
The Jordan Love Era Begins
Latest: Thirteen Below
Thursday at 2:45 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Fire Aaron Hill !!!
Latest: Thirteen Below
Thursday at 1:36 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Draft Talk
2013 Draft Archive
Is Ted interested in this guy?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top